Behavioral Subtyping is Equivalent to Modular Reasoning for Object-oriented Programs
نویسندگان
چکیده
Behavioral subtyping is an established idea that enables modular reasoning about behavioral properties of object-oriented programs. It requires that syntactic subtypes are behavioral refinements. It validates reasoning about a dynamically-dispatched method call, say E .m(), using the specification associated with the static type of the receiver expression E . For languages with references and mutable objects the idea of behavioral subtyping has not been rigorously formalized as such and the standard informal notion has inadequacies. This paper formalizes behavioral subtyping and introduces a new formalization of modular reasoning, called supertype abstraction. A Java-like sequential language is considered, with classes and interfaces, recursive types, first-class exceptions and handlers, and dynamically allocated mutable heap objects; the semantics is designed to serve as foundation for the Java Modeling Language (JML), a widely used specification language. Behavioral subtyping is characterized as sound and semantically complete for reasoning with supertype abstraction.
منابع مشابه
Behavioral Subtyping in Object-Oriented Languages
Modularity and code reuse are two important features of object-oriented programming. Modularity means that adding new components does not require reveri cation or respeci cation of existing components. A common form of reuse in objectoriented programs is to add new subtypes to existing types and to invoke already existing procedures with objects of these new types. In such cases, behavior of pr...
متن کاملConcepts of Behavioral Subtyping and a Sketch of their Extension to Component-Based Systems
Object-oriented systems are able to treat objects indirectly by message passing. This allows them to manipulate objects without knowing their exact runtime type. Behavioral subtyping helps one reason in a modular fashion about such programs. That is, one can reason based on the static types of expressions in a program, provided that static types are upper bounds of the runtime types in a subtyp...
متن کاملObliviousness, Modular Reasoning, and the Behavioral Subtyping Analogy
The obliviousness property of AspectJ conflicts with the ability to reason about an AspectJ program in a modular fashion. This makes debugging and maintenance difficult. In object-oriented programming, the discipline of behavioral subtyping allows one to reason about programs modularly, despite the somewhat oblivious nature of dynamic binding; however, it is not clear what discipline would help...
متن کاملLazy Behavioral Subtyping
Inheritance combined with late binding allows flexible code reuse but complicates formal reasoning significantly, as a method call’s receiver class is not statically known. This is especially true when programs are incrementally developed by extending class hierarchies. This paper develops a novel method to reason about late bound method calls. In contrast to traditional behavioral subtyping, r...
متن کاملA Behavioral Subtyping, Specification Inheritance, and Modular Reasoning
Verification of a dynamically-dispatched method call, E .m(), seems to depend on E ’s dynamic type. To avoid case analysis and allow incremental development, object-oriented program verification uses supertype abstraction. That is, one reasons about E .m() using m’s specification for E ’s static type. Supertype abstraction is valid when each subtype in the program is a behavioral subtype. This ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006